Reflections on Obsession and Ambition: Lessons from Life and Putin’s Pursuit

c

Introduction

Through my life’s journey, I’ve learned a profound truth: you cannot change an obsessed person who is hell-bent on pursuing their goals and ambitions. I believe this applies starkly to Vladimir Putin, whose singular focus on restoring Russia’s imperial influence seems immune to any form of conciliation or intervention. In fact, I’ve observed that such efforts might even entrench his ambitions further. Below, I explore why obsession resists change, why conciliation often fails (and can backfire), and how this dynamic manifests in Putin’s unyielding pursuit of his goals, drawing on psychological insights and analyses of the Ukraine conflict.

---

The Psychology of Obsession and Unchangeable Ambition

I’ve come to understand that obsession, when tied to ambition, creates a mindset that’s nearly impossible to sway. This aligns with psychological concepts like psychological reactance and cognitive dissonance. When I try to dissuade someone fixated on a goal, they often dig in deeper to protect their sense of self, a reaction I see as more than stubbornness—it’s a defense mechanism. Research on destructive leadership shows that traits like pathological narcissism or aggressive dominance, often seen in figures like Putin, make individuals view challenges as threats to their identity, doubling down on their goals rather than relenting Early trauma or formative experiences can fuel this, creating leaders who see concessions as weakness, a pattern I recognize in Putin’s relentless drive for control [https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2022-02-14/putins-forever-war.

I’ve seen this beyond politics—in entrepreneurs who cling to failing ventures or activists who radicalize under opposition. History echoes this too: Hitler’s expansionist obsession wasn’t curbed by appeasement; it emboldened him. Similarly, leaders like Saddam Hussein or Kim Jong-un have shown me that conciliatory efforts often reinforce their resolve, as yielding would unravel their carefully constructed narratives.

---

Putin’s Singular Goal: Restoration and Expansion

In Putin’s case, I see a man driven by one goal: restoring Russia’s imperial influence, viewing Ukraine as inseparable from Russia’s “historical unity” This isn’t a passing whim but a lifelong manifesto to dismantle the U.S.-led global order and assert regional dominance I’ve read analyses suggesting his invasion of Ukraine is a calculated move to eliminate perceived threats to Russia’s interests, framing it as a war against the West [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60621433.

Psychological profiles describe Putin as a “strong man” with sadistic hostility and exploitative narcissism, traits that cement his obsession regardless of the human cost I believe he’s confident in Russia’s resources for a prolonged conflict, seeing no reason to deviate from his path Even in mid-2025, reports indicate he remains focused on controlling significant parts of Ukraine, undeterred by setbacks [https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/07/10/putin-ukraine-war-goals-2025.

---

Why Conciliation Fails—and Might Backfire

I’ve learned that no amount of conciliation can sway someone like Putin. Conflict resolution models suggest negotiations with intractable leaders are doomed when one side feels they’re gaining ground Past efforts, like the Minsk agreements, collapsed because I see Putin treating concessions as tactical pauses, not genuine shifts Trust, essential for talks, is absent; his hesitance toward NATO escalation doesn’t signal flexibility on core goals [https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_111767.htm.

Worse, I’ve noticed that appeasement can fuel imperial ambitions, as warnings suggest it would only embolden Putin This confirms my fear that interventions might deepen his resolve. When pressured, I see him lean into a narrative of Russia as a besieged fortress, rallying domestic support and hardening his stance Neutral mediation struggles here, as obsession overrides pragmatic incentives Peace plans emphasizing strength acknowledge that without defeat, Putin has no reason to change course [https://www.cfr.org/article/what-putin-wants-ukraine.

---

Broader Lessons from Life and History

My life’s lesson extends beyond Putin—it’s a warning for dealing with any obsessed individual. In relationships, I’ve seen counseling a partner on a destructive path lead to defiance. In business, negotiating with a competitor fixated on dominance rarely yields compromise without leverage. The lesson? Change must come from within or through overwhelming external pressure, not persuasion alone.

As of August 2025, with talk of truces to cement Russian gains, I see Putin’s cycle persisting [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-15/russia-ukraine-truce-talks-2025]. As long as his obsession faces no decisive setbacks, conciliation risks not just failing but fueling his ambitions further. My insight reminds me to recognize when to stop trying to change the unchangeable and focus on containment instead.

---

By Mykola Mowczan

Date: August 13, 2025

---